New York State has embarked on a substantial effort to restructure its health care system as a result of rapidly escalating health care expenditures, especially with respect to Medicaid expenditures for institutional health care. But it is impossible toalter these high cost health expenditures without strengthening and expanding the primary care foundation on which New York’s health system rests.
Several features make primary care effective, and these features can be embodied in a range of service delivery models such as private group practices and hospital and freestanding clinic services. Health centers and hospital clinics represent particularly important sources of primary health care for populations at risk for medical underservice.
Extensive evidence on the impact of primary health care shows that regardless of how its effect is measured, more and better primary care results in more and better health outcomes, reduced health disparities, and reduced expenditures for avoidable institutional care. Extensive research also shows that health care safety net providers, especially health centers, are able to improve health outcomes, not only for individual patients but also for the communities they serve, in terms of lower infant mortality, lower rates of chronic conditions, especially among minority patients, and greater use of preventive services.
Important examples of primary health care reform to benefit medically underserved communities can be found in Dallas, Texas (a restructured, hospital based primary care delivery system) and Denver, Colorado (a partnership between a public health system and affiliated community health centers). These models suggest that New York’s hospitals and health centers, school health clinics, home health centers, community mental health centers, and other community based services, could achieve similar results — without new facility construction, and by emphasizing applied development of delivery networks.